The levels are cool but the story is almost nonexistent. The cast are used as basically an excuse to put you in real battles through flash backs. I’ve seen the game on sale for $20 and think it’s worth it but it’s not the best campaign or overall cod game in general imo. CaptanAmericano78 • 1 yr. ago.
Call of Duty: Ghosts. is a textbook example of why it both sucks and doesn’t suck to spend your time with a CoD campaign. On the good side, From the Call of Duty games of the past toFor a good setting and an attempt at a new continuity, Call of Duty Ghosts is a fun adventure that many overlook without a second thought. 9 Call of Duty: WWII (2017) With Ghost s we were left with a HUGE cliffhanger (the best and most interesting in the series in my opinion) witch has a lot of potential for a good campaign. So Ghosts was one of my favorite COD games. The campaign was good, so as Extinction and MP but due to the controversy it caused I doubt they'll finish the series (I hope I'm wrong)😥 MW3 while MW2.5 played significantly better than Ghosts and therefore for me it’s better. Not to mention the superior campaign and third mode. most of yous prefer MW3, but Ghosts are my all-time favourite (hoping for sequel) MW3 for me gets a lot of credit because of the way they handled DLC.
For Call of Duty: Ghosts on the Xbox One, a GameFAQs message board topic titled "Single player campaign any good.".
With the Modern Warfare trilogy laid to rest, Call of Duty: Ghosts marks a new chapter for the world’s favourite first-person shooter. It certainly talks a good game – promising further refinements to the series’ winning multiplayer action, including maps with destructible environments, whizzy new game modes and more customisation options for your virtual soldiers.
Call Of Duty Ghosts: Multiplayer But as any COD fan will tell you, the campaign is a mere hors d'oeuvre for players to enjoy before they get stuck into the game's main course: the online multiplayer.